Key Takeaways
Performance matters, but context is crucial. The three-year returns shown highlight strong results from these wealth managers, but they don’t reflect the full picture.
Risk-adjusted returns can be more telling. A higher return isn’t always better if it came with significantly more volatility. Ask wealth managers about their Sharpe ratios or other risk metrics.
“Balanced” means different things. Even within a standardised risk category, portfolio composition can vary widely across firms. Allocation differences affect performance and comparability.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Market conditions change, and so does manager performance. What worked over the last five years may not work in the next five.
This should be a starting point, not a decision. Use this data to shortlist firms, but also evaluate service quality, investment philosophy, fees, tax planning capabilities, and personal rapport.
In a world where market volatility has become the norm, investors seeking stability and steady growth face a delicate balancing act. This article dives into how top discretionary wealth managers in the balanced risk category have performed over the past three years, illustrating the strategies they used to manage inflation, rising interest rates, and geopolitical shocks while maintaining a strong focus on wealth protection.
Compiled by Managed Portfolio Indices (MPI), the analysis reveals the collective strategies of leading managers who’ve mastered the art of preserving wealth through turbulent cycles, proving that caution, when applied wisely, can still deliver meaningful growth. For these rankings, we have used MPI data sets 3 years up to Q1 2026.
What is a Balanced Portfolio?
A balanced portfolio typically aims to deliver a combination of capital growth and capital preservation. While not strictly defined, it often includes:
- 50–60% equities - driving long-term growth through exposure to global markets.
- 30–40% bonds or fixed income - providing diversification and some income stability.
- Up to 20% alternatives or cash - provides liquidity and reduces volatility, with some cautious portfolios also allocating a small proportion to alternatives such as property, private credit, or absolute return strategies for diversification
These portfolios appeal to investors with a medium risk tolerance who want steady long-term returns without the full volatility of equity markets [1].
That said, "balanced" means different things across firms, making direct comparisons an art as much as a science.
Why Balanced Strategies Differ
Even within the balanced category, approaches can diverge. Some managers favour a steadier mix of equities and bonds to smooth returns, while others add alternatives or tactical shifts to manage volatility and enhance resilience. Understanding these nuances is essential, and benchmarks provide useful context for comparisons.
Key Factors That Shaped the Last 3 Years (2024–2026)
The period from 2024 to 2026 was anything but stable. Yet top wealth managers delivered balanced portfolios that provided strong returns. Wealth managers had to navigate a series of transformative events, including:
1. A Historic Inflation Cycle
Runaway inflation became one of the biggest challenges of the decade, eroding savings and driving sharp losses in both equities and bonds. Many investors without professional guidance saw their portfolios hit hard. By contrast, working with a wealth manager meant having a clear financial plan, regularly reviewed and adjusted to changing conditions. This proactive approach helped clients limit losses and stay aligned with their long-term goals [1].
2. Rising Interest Rates
As interest rates surged to multi-decade highs, borrowing costs rose sharply, making it harder for businesses to secure credit and invest in growth. Yet for investors, the same environment opened opportunities, with bond yields and fixed income offering attractive returns not seen in years. Skilled wealth managers helped clients capture this upside while managing the risks, keeping portfolios resilient and income-generating through a challenging cycle [2].
3. Geopolitical Disruption
From Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to tensions in Asia and ongoing energy shocks, geopolitical risks reshaped markets and drove volatility across asset classes. While many investors struggled, the top wealth managers in the UK navigated these disruptions with adaptive, balanced strategies that protected wealth and maintained steady returns [3].
4. The AI Boom and Valuation Risk
The rapid rise of artificial intelligence has driven a strong rally in a small number of large technology stocks, as markets priced in significant long-term growth. While this created major opportunities for investors with exposure, it also increased concentration risk. As AI spending accelerated and new entrants such as DeepSeek emerged, volatility in leading AI stocks increased, with elevated valuations making share prices more sensitive to shifts in growth expectations.
5. The Wider Impact Across the Market
The surge in AI capabilities unsettled investors across the broader market. Technology stocks without a clear AI growth narrative came under pressure. Beyond the technology sector itself, expectations that automation could reshape employment patterns and reduce long-term demand for office space weighed on commercial property companies, reflecting concerns about structural shifts in workspace usage.
Using the Results in Your Decision-Making
The rankings are not about finding a single “winner.” Instead, it provides context: a broad view of how professional managers in the growth category have performed through a period of rapid change.
For investors, the value lies in using the results as a benchmark:
- Comparing how prospective wealth managers stack up against peers in the same risk category.
- Asking sharper questions about a firm’s strategy, asset mix, and approach to risk management.
- Understanding whether a manager’s results stem from tactical choices, long-term philosophy, or exposure to specific markets and sectors.
Ultimately, it is best used as a starting point. It highlights managers who have delivered strong performance, but it does not replace thorough due diligence. Assessing a manager’s process, team, governance, and client fit remains essential before making an allocation decision.
Disclaimer
Compare Wealth Managers is an Appointed Representative of Strata Global Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN: 563834). This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and you may get back less than you invested. Always conduct your own research or speak to a qualified advisor before making financial decisions.
