 are often presented as sophisticated estate planning solutions. In reality, they are best understood as one option among many for families trying to balance growth, control and the gradual transfer of wealth.

Used appropriately, a FIC can play a valuable role in long-term planning. Used indiscriminately, it can introduce cost, complexity and rigidity without delivering proportionate benefit. As with most planning structures, its effectiveness depends less on the mechanics and more on whether it genuinely fits the family’s circumstances 

Family investment companies – how they work

, explains, a family investment company is simply a company structure that has been designed and used for specific 

 purposes. The structure itself is neutral. The outcomes depend entirely on how and why it is used.

 vehicles. More recently, they have gained prominence as alternatives to 

. That visibility has been helpful, but it has also encouraged the idea that the structure itself is the solution, rather than a tool that must earn its place.

Why Families Consider Family Investment Companies

The starting point for a FIC should never be 

 alone. By the time a company structure is appropriate, families have usually reached a clear conclusion that some assets will never be required to support their own lifestyle.

“There’s typically been quite a lot of advice given” before a FIC is set up, Gareth notes. Detailed cashflow modelling is normally required to establish whether assets are genuinely surplus. Without that work, families 

 transferring capital into a structure that later proves restrictive, expensive or difficult to unwind.

Where surplus assets are clearly identified, the attraction is understandable. Assets can be moved out of the estate, with future growth falling outside the inheritance tax net immediately, while the 

How can a Family Investment Company help reduce inheritance tax?

However, that benefit only matters where 

 is a material issue. For many families, estates are either too small for the tax saving to justify the structure, or sufficiently dynamic that locking assets away introduces more risk than reward.

Freezing Wealth and Accepting the Trade-Offs

FICs are often described as a way of “freezing” wealth. The intention is not to limit investment growth, but to prevent future growth from compounding the inheritance tax problem.

In practical terms, once surplus assets are transferred, any future growth on those assets falls outside the estate immediately, even though the original value remains relevant for inheritance tax during the seven-year period. This can stabilise the value of what remains taxable while allowing wealth to build elsewhere.

In practice, freezing wealth also freezes flexibility. Capital placed into a company structure is no longer readily available to meet changing needs, opportunities or unforeseen costs. That loss of optionality is often underappreciated at the outset, particularly where future spending, health or family circumstances are uncertain.

For families whose financial position is still evolving, this rigidity can outweigh the tax advantage the structure was designed to achieve.

One of the defining features of a FIC is the separation of economic benefit from control. Beneficiaries can be entitled to future growth without holding voting rights or accessing assets directly.

This is particularly appealing where families want to begin inheritance tax planning but are concerned about timing. “They want to get the assets outside of their estate,” Gareth explains, “but they maybe don’t want the beneficiary to be able to control or have any access to that asset.”

That concern is often well founded. Significant wealth transferred too early can distort incentives, reduce motivation or expose beneficiaries to risks they are not yet equipped to manage 

Family Investment Companies Unpacked: Corporate Tax and Accounting Explained

The trade-off is administration. Company structures require accounts, filings, professional advice and ongoing governance. They are more expensive and time-consuming than outright ownership, and those costs persist regardless of investment performance.

Family Investment Companies Compared With Trusts

Family investment companies are frequently compared with trusts, and in many respects they perform a similar function. Both can remove assets from an estate while preserving a degree of control.

The differences lie primarily in taxation and long-term flexibility. Trusts can trigger immediate inheritance tax charges on funding and periodic charges thereafter. For larger sums, those charges can be prohibitive. As Gareth notes, “for somebody who wants to put £10 million into a trust… they have to pay £2 million to get the money in there.”

FICs avoid those upfront and periodic inheritance tax charges, which explains their growing popularity for substantial estates.

Trusts, however, offer advantages that companies do not. They allow for classes of beneficiaries rather than named individuals, which can make them more adaptable as families grow and circumstances change. Over longer time horizons, that flexibility can be valuable 

Trusts and taxes: overview

Neither structure is inherently superior. The right choice depends on scale, complexity, family dynamics and the level of ongoing engagement the family is prepared to maintain.

One of the most common problems with FICs is that they are sometimes used because they are available, rather than because they are necessary.

Company structures are more complex than holding assets outright and harder to unwind once established. Gareth has seen situations where families received good initial advice but limited follow-up, leaving adult children constrained by arrangements that no longer serve a clear purpose.

At that point, families face an uncomfortable choice: accept ongoing cost and friction, or unwind structures that were intended to be helpful but have outlived their usefulness.

For this reason, FICs work best where there is a clear rationale for delay and a shared understanding of what will eventually change 

Family Investment Companies

A FIC can support estate planning, but it cannot replace financial education. As Gareth puts it, the structure “doesn’t solve the problem of needing to educate the next generation on wealth.”

At some point, control will pass. When it does, beneficiaries need the skills, judgement and confidence to manage what they receive. A company structure can buy time, but it does not remove that responsibility.

As Gareth notes, a FIC, like a trust or even a JISA for a younger child, can help engage the next generation in wealth and legal discussions “without them being able to physically access the money and run off down the Porsche garage.”

Family investment companies can be effective in the right circumstances. They can reduce inheritance tax exposure, protect future growth and help families manage the transition of wealth across generations.

But they are not a default solution. They are expensive to run, time-consuming to manage and inflexible once in place. For many families, simpler approaches deliver better outcomes with fewer compromises 

Wealth managers issue ‘health warning’ over inheritance tax vehicles

The real value of a FIC lies not in its technical features, but in the discipline it enforces: clarity on what is surplus, realism about control, and a willingness to plan for responsibility, not just tax.

Family investment companies are not one-size-fits-all.

 A FIC can support estate planning and wealth protection, but only where assets are genuinely surplus and long-term complexity is justified.

Tax benefits rely on integrated planning.

 Inheritance tax efficiency comes from aligning a FIC with wider business exit planning or post-sale strategy, not from using the structure in isolation.

Control comes with cost and responsibility.

 FICs offer oversight of wealth transfer, but they are expensive to run, time-consuming to manage and require ongoing professional advice.

Flexibility is reduced once assets are transferred.

 Freezing wealth inside a FIC can limit access to capital, which may create issues after selling your business in the UK or if circumstances change.

 A FIC can delay access to capital and support long-term planning, but successful wealth protection still depends on preparing the next generation.

What Is a Family Investment Company and Is One Right for You?

 and felt overwhelmed by the sheer number of options? Do you know what they offer and whether they align with your financial goals?

Choosing a wealth manager best suited to your needs is just as crucial as financial planning itself. Each firm has its own unique approach, philosophy, and expertise, tailored to different client needs. At Compare Wealth Managers, we recognise the vital role a skilled financial planner can play in securing your future. That’s why we’ve compiled a list of our top UK wealth management firms, highlighting their key strengths and what sets them apart. Discover which one aligns bestwithyourfinancialaspirations.

A good wealth manager combines technical expertise with the ability to deliver client-focused advice. They must understand 

, and portfolio construction, and then integrate these elements into a coherent strategy tailored to each client’s circumstances 

What is a Private Wealth Manager?

Equally important are communication and trust. The best wealth managers listen carefully to their clients, explain complex ideas in straightforward language, and build long-term relationships that extend across generations. This ability to foster confidence and clarity helps clients remain committed to their strategies through different market cycles 

How to choose a wealth manager

Transparency and accountability are also critical. A good wealth manager is clear about fees, explains how investment decisions are made, and ensures that all actions align with the client’s stated goals and 

 tolerance. Strong governance and ethical standards underpin this approach, giving clients the confidence that their interests always come first 

Dear CEO letter: FCA expectations of wealth management and stockbroking firms.

Finally, leading wealth managers offer a clear value proposition. They provide services that are designed for the specific needs of their target clients, whether that is high-net-worth families, 

, or institutional investors. This specialisation allows them to deliver bespoke planning, tailored portfolios, and innovative solutions such as sustainable investing or access to private markets 

Five Keys to Consistent Success in Wealth Management

For investors with £500,000 to £25 million in investable assets, wealth management rankings provide a valuable benchmark. They allow you to compare firms not only on assets under management (AUM) and scale, but also on reputation, service quality, and investment approach. Rankings highlight which firms are best equipped to manage complex portfolios, which specialise in bespoke advice, and how each positions itself within the competitive UK market. As the 

 notes, wealth managers increasingly compete on scale, reputation and client differentiation, underscoring why rankings offer meaningful context to investors 

Wall Street is racing to manage your wealth. That is a good thing.

How to Use Wealth Management Rankings Effectively

Wealth management rankings should be used as a guide to narrow the field, not as a definitive verdict. They provide an objective way to compare firms on scale, reputation, and service quality, helping investors identify which are best suited to complex portfolios or bespoke advice. The key is to align these insights with your personal goals, ensuring that the firms you consider reflect your risk appetite, investment horizon, and long-term priorities.

If you need support finding the right wealth manager, Compare Wealth Managers offers a free service to help you find a wealth advisor/manager suited to your needs. Simply click the orange "

" button to get started and check out our 5* reviews from Trustpilot.

 – Firms such as James Hambro & Partners, Saltus, and Evelyn Partners feature among the best wealth managers UK, recognised for strong client service and consistent portfolio results.

 – The leading wealth management firms collectively oversee significant AUM, demonstrating financial strength, resilience, and the scale to support high-net-worth clients.

 – Top firms provide bespoke strategies across investment management, tax planning, and estate structuring to help clients protect and grow wealth across generations.

 – Many of the best wealth managers combine international investment expertise with local insight, offering diversified opportunities across markets.

 – Established names in the rankings are known for long-standing reputations, governance standards, and multi-generational relationships with clients.

 – The top wealth management firms in London and across the UK integrate ESG, alternatives, and diversified portfolios to deliver sustainable long-term growth.

This article ranks the top ten wealth management firms in the UK in 2025, highlighting their scale, client service, and long-term expertise.

The ranking compares firms across assets under management, minimum investment requirements, and bespoke services, offering investors insight into the diversity and strengths of the UK wealth management industry.
Compare Wealth Managers

It reflects strategies focused on integrated financial planning, personalised investment advice, and the ability to balance global capabilities with local market knowledge.
Compare Wealth Managers

The article is not about finding a single “best” firm, but about providing context on how leading wealth managers operate — a useful benchmark when selecting the right partner for your wealth.

Top Ten Wealth Management Firms in the UK

 has long sat at the heart of succession planning for farming families. For decades, it allowed agricultural land, buildings and associated assets to pass between generations with little or no 

, helping farms remain intact rather than being broken up to meet tax liabilities 

. As a result, many families came to see APR as a permanent fixture of the landscape, something that worked quietly in the background and rarely needed revisiting.

Agricultural Relief for Inheritance Tax

That sense of certainty has now shifted. While recent lobbying has softened the government’s original proposals, APR can no longer be treated as a passive or automatic protection. Instead, it requires a more deliberate understanding of asset values, ownership structures and long-term planning. The relief still exists and remains valuable, but families are being asked to engage with it in a way they have not needed to for decades.

To explore what these changes mean in practice, we spoke with 

, whose work focuses on complex rural estates and long-term intergenerational planning.

What APR Covers and What It No Longer Quietly Ignores

APR is often spoken about as a single, standalone relief, but in reality it operates alongside 

, and the distinction between the two is increasingly important. Together, they form the backbone of inheritance planning for most farming businesses 

IHT Business and Agricultural property reliefs are changing

“As you’d expect, APR covers agricultural land and farm buildings,” Tom explains. “But in a farming context, we can also bring in business property relief, which can apply to machinery, livestock and certain diversification activities like farm shops or holiday lets.”

It is this combined framework that determines how much of a farm’s overall value can pass between generations without triggering inheritance tax. Under the revised proposals, which are due to take effect from April 2026, the government will introduce a cap on the total value of qualifying assets that can pass free of inheritance tax. Following recent amendments, that cap now stands at £2.5 million per individual, and importantly, it can be transferred between spouses.

“In practical terms,” Tom says, “for a typical family farm, assets up to around £5 million could pass free of inheritance tax. Anything above that level is taxed at an effective rate of 20%, rather than the usual 40%.”

The Thresholds Have Moved, But the Pressure Hasn’t Disappeared

At first glance, the revised thresholds appear generous, and in many cases they will protect smaller farms from any immediate 

 exposure. However, Tom is clear that this does not remove the challenge for a significant number of working agricultural businesses.

“Agricultural businesses are often very asset-rich but quite cash-poor,” he explains 

. “So even a reduced inheritance tax bill can feel very significant if it hasn’t been planned for.”

Valuation of Agricultural and Business Property

A farming estate valued at £7 million, for example, could now face an inheritance tax bill of around £400,000. While current rules allow that bill to be paid over ten years, interest-free, the ongoing burden should not be underestimated.

“That still means finding around £40,000 a year from a business where cash flow is often tight,” Tom notes. “For a lot of families, that would come as a real shock.”

What makes this particularly difficult is that many farming families have never had to think in these terms before. Assets have passed from one generation to the next without anyone needing to ask uncomfortable questions about value, 

A Farm Is a Business That Can’t Be Broken Up

Succession planning for farms brings challenges that are rarely present in other estates. A farm is not simply a collection of valuable assets; it is a single, interdependent business. Land, buildings, machinery, agreements and people all rely on each other to function effectively 

Total income from farming in the UK in 2024

“These are treasured assets that realistically need to be kept together,” Tom explains. “You can’t carve up a farm and expect it to continue operating in the same way.”

Unlike residential property or financial 

, fragmenting ownership or forcing sales to meet tax liabilities can undermine the commercial viability of the entire enterprise. This makes forward planning not just sensible, but essential.

Before You Plan for Tax, You Have to Understand Ownership

When asked where families should begin, Tom is unequivocal that the starting point is not tax mitigation strategies, but understanding ownership in detail.

“The most useful place to start is getting a really firm grip on who owns what,” he says. “It sounds simple, but over time and over generations, it often becomes very complicated.”

Land and assets may be spread across individuals, farming partnerships, companies or 

, with some family members actively involved in running the business and others entirely removed from day-to-day operations.

“Without that clarity,” Tom explains, “you don’t really know the size of each person’s estate, who might ultimately face a tax bill, or even who would be expected to pay it.”

The Conversations That Decide More Than the Numbers

While technical planning tools are available, Tom believes the greatest 

 lies not in the rules themselves, but in how families respond to them.

“The biggest danger at the moment is thinking this is all going to go away,” he says. “There’s been a lot of lobbying and the outcome is better than it was, but the government does seem determined to implement these changes.” 

Successfully handing the reins to the next generation

Just as important are the human conversations that many families delay because they are uncomfortable or emotionally charged. Decisions about involvement, responsibility and future control often prove harder than addressing the financial implications.

“These conversations go well beyond financial planning,” Tom explains. “They’re about family dynamics, responsibility and long-term stewardship.”

The Window for Action Is Narrower Than Many Realise

Despite the challenges, Tom is clear that families are not without options. Gifting, trusts and life insurance can all play a role in managing inheritance tax exposure, provided they are used thoughtfully and in the right order.

However, many of these strategies depend on time. You must survive 7 years following a gift of over £3,000 for it to be completely free from inheritance tax, and delayed action can sharply limit what is achievable.

“Hearing about this late, and with implementation happening relatively quickly, does still present challenges,” Tom acknowledges. “Which is why starting sooner rather than later is so important.”

APR Still Protects Farms: Just Not by Default

The revised APR regime is unquestionably less punitive than originally proposed, and many smaller farms are likely to remain unaffected. The relief still plays a vital role in protecting working agricultural businesses and supporting long-term stewardship.

What has changed is the need for engagement.

Families can no longer assume APR will simply take care of itself. Understanding ownership, questioning assumptions that may have gone unchallenged for decades, and starting clear, honest conversations are now essential steps in ensuring farms remain viable for the next generation, not just from a tax perspective, but as functioning businesses with a future.

 — While recent changes mean up to £2.5 million per individual (or £5 million per couple) of qualifying agricultural and business assets can still pass free of inheritance tax, relief above this level is now capped, creating a potential 20% tax charge on excess value.

 — Understanding exactly who owns each asset, and how those assets are structured across individuals, partnerships, companies or trusts, is the starting point for any effective APR strategy.

Succession planning must protect the working farm

 — Farms are integrated businesses, not collections of standalone assets. Poorly coordinated planning or unanticipated tax liabilities can disrupt commercial continuity and undermine long-term viability.

Existing wills and trusts may no longer be fit for purpose

 — Many documents were drafted under the assumption of full APR. Reviewing and updating them is essential to ensure estates are structured efficiently under the new rules.

Early, specialist advice reduces costly mistakes

 — With limited liquidity, tighter timeframes and greater complexity, expert guidance helps families manage inheritance tax exposure while safeguarding the farm’s multi-generational future.

Agricultural Property Relief: What Changing Rules Mean for Farming Families

Client services director at Compare Wealth Managers.

Paul Dredge

Bio

Articles from author

What Is a Family Investment Company and Is One Right for You?

Top Ten Wealth Management Firms in the UK

Agricultural Property Relief: What Changing Rules Mean for Farming Families

Start your journey to your
Financial well-being

FIND OUT MORE

LEGAL

CONTACT US

Paul Dredge

Bio

Articles from author

What Is a Family Investment Company and Is One Right for You?

Top Ten Wealth Management Firms in the UK

Agricultural Property Relief: What Changing Rules Mean for Farming Families

Start your journey to your Financial well-being

FIND OUT MORE

LEGAL

CONTACT US

Start your journey to your
Financial well-being